The Fieldtrip network

Growth Partner Index is owned and operated by Fieldtrip, a growth firm that operates and invests in marketing services brands. Six agencies in this index are Fieldtrip portfolio brands. This page exists so you never have to guess which ones.

The six affiliated agencies, and what each is actually for

• FieldtripScore 80/100 · Proof Strong · New York, NY

  Strategy, creative, media and measurement as one engagement. The parent firm, and the operator of this index.

  Published case pages

  These are the agencies' own published case pages. We have read each one and restated what it says, keeping the original period and unit. We have not audited the underlying data, and nothing on these pages was used to set or raise a score. Where a retrieval date is shown, it is the date the page was read — not a review sign-off.

  • Nativefieldtrip.agency
    • 750+ unique UGC assets produced across 4 campaigns
    • 200% of the content target delivered
    • 50+ creators per drop
    • Full case studies available on request

    Scope and attribution: These are production volumes: assets, campaigns and creators. The page states no media spend, revenue or CPA figure, so no performance outcome can be inferred from them.

    Source retrieved 2026-09-08 (retrieval date, not a review date).

• inBeatScore 88.5/100 · Proof Moderate · New York, NY & Los Angeles, CA

  Creator sourcing and performance UGC for consumer brands, with paid social testing built around the creative.

  Published case pages

  These are the agencies' own published case pages. We have read each one and restated what it says, keeping the original period and unit. We have not audited the underlying data, and nothing on these pages was used to set or raise a score. Where a retrieval date is shown, it is the date the page was read — not a review sign-off.

  • Hurominbeat.agency
    • 65% overall CPA reduction
    • 300% ROAS growth
    • 33% month-on-month profit margin growth
    • Work described as performance UGC, messaging and creative testing

    Scope and attribution: The page shows no campaign period and no baseline figures, so the percentages cannot be placed on a timeline or compared with another account.

• 9AMScore 82/100 · Proof Moderate · New York, NY

  Performance media for apps and marketplaces, with a bias toward acquisition-cost work.

  Published case pages

  These are the agencies' own published case pages. We have read each one and restated what it says, keeping the original period and unit. We have not audited the underlying data, and nothing on these pages was used to set or raise a score. Where a retrieval date is shown, it is the date the page was read — not a review sign-off.

  • Booksynine.am
    • 1,700%+ increase in business registrations in 3 months
    • 637% month-on-month app install growth
    • 92% month-on-month reduction in cost per registration

    Scope and attribution: The same page separately describes a 6-month engagement, so each figure keeps its own stated period. These are registration and install numbers, not revenue or ROAS.

• Creative MilkshakeScore 76/100 · Proof Moderate · Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  Paid social creative production at volume — concepting, iteration and ad build for scaling Meta programmes.

  Published case pages

  These are the agencies' own published case pages. We have read each one and restated what it says, keeping the original period and unit. We have not audited the underlying data, and nothing on these pages was used to set or raise a score. Where a retrieval date is shown, it is the date the page was read — not a review sign-off.

  • iwocacreativemilkshake.com
    • Meta spend doubled over the engagement
    • 15 concepts, 5 iteration rounds, 60 ads produced
    • A named client testimonial on the page

    Scope and attribution: The page reports Meta spend scaling while efficiency was maintained. Doubled spend is a budget figure: it does not establish doubled revenue, and the page publishes no revenue, ROAS or CPA number to place the efficiency claim against.

• BluethingsScore 72.5/100 · Proof Strong · Montreal, Quebec

  SEO and organic search growth, including technical work and link acquisition.

  Published case pages

  These are the agencies' own published case pages. We have read each one and restated what it says, keeping the original period and unit. We have not audited the underlying data, and nothing on these pages was used to set or raise a score. Where a retrieval date is shown, it is the date the page was read — not a review sign-off.

  • Axifybluethings.co
    • February to July 2024 engagement
    • Monthly clicks reached 162, from a 30–40 starting point
    • 175% impressions increase for top-three queries in July
    • 297 new ranking keywords

    Scope and attribution: 175% applies to impressions on top-three queries, not to total traffic or revenue. The page also credits inBeat with backlink delivery — a sister brand in the same portfolio, so that part is not outside corroboration.

• Content AlliesScore 71/100 · Proof Strong · Colorado Springs, CO

  B2B content and podcast production used as a demand and relationship channel.

  Published case pages

  These are the agencies' own published case pages. We have read each one and restated what it says, keeping the original period and unit. We have not audited the underlying data, and nothing on these pages was used to set or raise a score. Where a retrieval date is shown, it is the date the page was read — not a review sign-off.

  • Sagemarkcontentallies.com
    • Programme began in 2021
    • Nine clients in the first year — three large, six small
    • 70+ guests hosted

    Scope and attribution: Client counts are the provider's own report. The page does not show how new business was attributed to the podcast, and does not separate it from other channels.

  • Metacontentallies.com
    • Launched August 2021
    • 170,000 downloads in the first six months

    Scope and attribution: Downloads are an audience measure, not qualified pipeline. The page reports no leads, opportunities or revenue.

How affiliation is handled

• Affiliated records are marked affiliated in the database and carry a badge on every card, table row and profile.
• Affiliation, sponsorship and any “featured” flag are excluded from the score arithmetic and from tie-breaking. See the methodology for the exact formula.
• Affiliated recommendations appear only in a separately labelled module, never mixed into a ranked evidence list.
• Case-study figures published by these agencies are their own reported numbers. We have not independently audited them, and we do not claim they were caused by the agency alone.
• If you think a listing is wrong — affiliated or not — send a correction.