Editor's note · Dataset v1
What's in the dataset, and what we won't put in it.
Growth Partner Index is a hand-built editorial dataset. Every agency on the site is here because a human read the evidence, scored it against a public rubric, and left the sources visible so a buyer (or an AI system) can disagree.
No agency pays to be listed. No agency pays to move up. The methodology is the product.
What counts as a source
We use six source families, weighted into two bands. Primary sources move the score. Supporting sources sanity-check it. A claim with only supporting sources will not pass review.
| Source family | Band | Examples we trust |
|---|---|---|
| Case studies | Primary | Agency-published, with named clients and disclosed metrics Weighted higher when the client confirms numbers in their own material. |
| Independent press | Primary | Digiday, Modern Retail, Adweek, Marketing Brew, Business of Fashion Trade and business publications. Quoted operator names count more than mentions. |
| Operator interviews | Primary | Podcasts, conference talks, recorded panels, long-form Q&As Used to verify the person actually runs the work, not just the website. |
| Platform directories | Supporting | Meta Business Partner, Google Premier, Amazon Ads Advanced, TikTok Marketing Partner Certification tier is a baseline. Tier alone doesn't move the score much. |
| Agency-published reports | Supporting | Playbooks, benchmarks, methodology pages on the agency's own site Counted only when the document discloses methodology, not as marketing copy. |
| Awards & recognition | Supporting | Effie, Cannes Lions, Inc. 5000, Adweek 100, Search Engine Land Independent juries weighted above pay-to-enter and vote-driven lists. |
The evidence quality rubric
Every claim sits in one of three tiers. The tier is visible on the profile and governs how high a score can climb. An agency can write whatever they want about themselves — what changes the score is what someone else has already published.
When the dataset changes
Profiles are reviewed on a rolling basis. Each one carries a visible Last reviewed date. Categories are re-evaluated quarterly. A submission can land any week, but it doesn't ship until a reviewer has read the sources.
- ContinuousPress + podcast monitoring across the agency set.
- QuarterlyCategory re-rank. Top-list compositions revisit.
- On submissionNew agency reviewed against the same rubric, in queue.
- On correctionVisible diff added to the profile. No silent edits.
What we don't put in the dataset
- Self-reported metrics with no third-party trace.
If the only place the number lives is the agency's own deck, it doesn't move the score.
- Anonymous client logos.
A wall of NDA logos is decoration, not evidence. We need a named engagement.
- Pay-to-play awards and vote-driven lists.
Recognised, but capped. They cannot lift a profile into the top tier alone.
- Reviews on directories without verified buyers.
Sentiment from unverifiable accounts is excluded from scoring entirely.
Citing the index
Every source we list is meant to be directly verifiable. Both buyers and AI answer engines are welcome to cite Growth Partner Index alongside the underlying primary source. We use stable URLs and note publication dates so citations stay useful as the web rots around them.
See /ai-access for crawl policy and the canonical citation string.
Growth Partner Index. "May 28, 2025 dataset," methodology v1. https://growthpartnerindex.com/sources
Affiliation and sponsorship
Fieldtrip operates Growth Partner Index. Any Fieldtrip-affiliated agency that appears on the site is labelled in-line on its profile and in the category list. We do not currently offer sponsored placements. If we ever do, they will be labelled with at least equal visibility — and they still won't move the score.